Spreadsheets don't lose inventory. Your team does — because of spreadsheets.
- Yuneva Stock Count
- Jul 6
- 2 min read
Most of the inventory problems I've seen didn't start with a bad process. They started with a spreadsheet that was 95% fine. That 5% is where the pain lives.
Here's a scenario I've watched play out more than once. A team finishes a cycle count, someone keys the numbers in, and one row gets pasted over another. Nobody catches it because the sheet still balances — technically. Two weeks later, a 3PL client is short 200 units of a SKU that the system says is fully stocked, and now you're doing an emergency recount at 11pm trying to figure out where the number went wrong. The count itself took two hours. The fallout took two days.
The actual cost of spreadsheet-based inventory isn't the subscription you're not paying. It's the labor that gets eaten up reconciling versions, the mis-ships that happen when someone's working from a file that was current on Tuesday, and the mental load on your leads who have to be the human error-check on top of everything else they're doing. That last one never shows up on a P&L, but it burns people out.
Version control is the killer. The moment a sheet lives in email attachments or a shared drive where two people can open it at the same time, you no longer have one source of truth. You have several competing ones, and nobody knows which is real until something goes wrong.
If your counting process still runs on a spreadsheet, I'm not here to tell you you're doing it wrong — I've done it too. But it's worth being honest about what that setup is actually costing you, in rework, in re-counts, in the counts you think you did but didn't really.
If any of this is familiar, take a look at what Yuneva has built at www.yuneva.com — their mobile counting tool CountIt lives at www.count-inventory.com and it's designed specifically for the part of the process where spreadsheets tend to fall apart.
Comments